The Ethics of AI: A Human-Centric Approach to Artificial Intelligence in Education
Today, we're diving deep into a topic that's not just timely, but absolutely crucial: the ethics of AI. When we talk about artificial intelligence transforming education, it’s not just about the shiny new gadgets or the promise of personalized learning
Indra kumar
5/5/20254 min read


While the future of artificial intelligence in education shines bright, we'd be remiss not to acknowledge the shadow it casts in terms of risks and concerns. The ethical considerations surrounding artificial intelligence adoption in education are paramount. The very fabric of our educational institutions, and indeed, the lives of our students, depend on how we navigate the ethics of AI.
Back in 2019, the Alan Turing Institute, a beacon of AI research, published a groundbreaking report on understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety. This wasn't just another document; it was a comprehensive guide to the ethics of AI in the public sector. The report highlighted several critical forms of potential harm that could arise from AI systems – issues that directly impact the ethics of AI. These included:
Bias and discrimination: A fundamental challenge to the ethics of AI, where algorithms can perpetuate and even amplify existing societal biases.
Denial of individual autonomy, recourse, and rights: A critical point in the ethics of AI, ensuring that students maintain control and have avenues for redress.
Non-transparent, unexplainable, or unjustifiable outcomes: A transparency issue central to the ethics of AI, demanding that we understand why AI makes certain decisions.
Invasion of privacy: A huge concern for the ethics of AI, especially when dealing with sensitive student data.
Isolation and disintegration of social connection: A human-centric ethics of AI consideration, ensuring that technology enhances, not diminishes, human interaction.
Unreliable, unsafe, or poor-quality outcomes: A quality assurance aspect of the ethics of AI, ensuring that AI tools are effective and dependable.
Our aim here is to peel back the layers of these specific risks and the broader ethics of AI that profoundly affect its applicability within the education space. These aren't just theoretical debates; these are real-world challenges that could, unfortunately, deter some institutions from fully embracing the power of AI tools. The ethics of AI demands our attention to unlock its true potential.
Let's kick things off with a major one: data privacy. In our data-rich world, the sheer volume of information is staggering. And here’s the kicker: the more data an AI algorithm is fed, the "smarter" it becomes. This creates a fascinating, yet challenging, dilemma for institutions eager to adopt AI. They must perform a delicate balancing act: harnessing the power of artificial intelligence through data collection, while simultaneously safeguarding the sensitive and private information of their students. This is where the ethics of AI truly comes into play.
This balancing act becomes even more complex when you consider that the entities collecting and visualizing this data are often private companies. By their very nature, these private companies are less directly accountable to stakeholders, especially students. So, how do we tackle these profound ethical issues concerning AI? Actions must be undertaken on multiple fronts. Institutions bear a significant responsibility to foster a consensus among all stakeholders, particularly students, about precisely what information AI may access and how that information will be utilized. This is a non-negotiable aspect of the ethics of AI.
Another crucial aspect to ponder is the future role of AI at the expense of our invaluable educators. While the prevailing belief is that AI in education aims to support, not replace, teachers, there are understandable pockets of reluctance among educators to fully embrace AI. This apprehension is often more pronounced with intelligent tutoring systems, where AI takes the reins in determining student learning activities. Personally, I'm convinced that AI will not replace teachers. Instead, AI will become an indispensable ally.
On one hand, AI can empower teachers to automate those tedious, repetitive tasks, freeing them up to dedicate more time to the art of teaching and high-impact activities. This is the positive side of the ethics of AI, where technology serves humanity. On the other hand, AI can furnish invaluable insights into student development, understanding, and areas ripe for improvement. However, given the undeniable benefits of AI-powered tools, there's a risk that many schools and academics might unintentionally become too reliant on AI adoption. For this very reason, it is absolutely paramount for institutions to proactively identify and continuously share best practices on the use and implementation of AI in education. The goal? To ensure that the human element remains squarely at the center of the learning experience. This is a core tenet of the ethics of AI.
Now, let's talk about a thorny ethical consideration concerning artificial intelligence: bias. In a nutshell, the fundamental issue is that machine learning models, by their very nature, tend to replicate any biases present in their training data. Therefore, an AI model constructed with a specific, potentially biased, dataset will almost certainly continue to exclude or disadvantage certain groups of people. This is a critical challenge for the ethics of AI.
Consider this practical example: the University of Texas at Austin once used machine learning to evaluate applicants to its PhD program in computer science. Because the program's database incorporated past admission decisions into its algorithm, opportunities for students from diverse backgrounds were significantly, and unintentionally, reduced. This is a stark illustration of the real-world impact of bias in AI, and a powerful argument for vigilant attention to the ethics of AI.
The path to overcoming this insidious issue of bias in AI is still evolving. To begin, experts suggest that one possible solution to at least alleviate the effect of biases is to diversify the group of people involved in creating the algorithm itself. A more diverse team brings a wider range of perspectives, which can help identify and mitigate potential biases in the AI system. Another crucial route is to keep humans deeply involved in the decision-making process alongside the AI-powered algorithm, and to continuously review and adjust the algorithm for biases. This human-in-the-loop approach is essential for upholding the ethics of AI.
A final factor to consider when adopting AI in education concerns its practical implementation. The reality is that many institutions not only lack the robust ethical frameworks necessary for technology adoption, but also, most institutional data isn't organized in a way that truly benefits from the implementation of artificial intelligence. This isn't just a technical hurdle; it’s an ethical one too, as it impacts the fairness and effectiveness of AI deployment.
Being keenly aware of these ethical considerations is not merely an academic exercise; it is a critical, foundational step to help unlock the immense potential of AI as a transformative force in teaching and learning. The ethics of AI isn't about stifling innovation; it's about guiding it responsibly, ensuring that artificial intelligence serves humanity and enhances the educational journey for all. The future of education, powered by AI, hinges on our unwavering commitment to the ethics of AI.